Current prediction markets show a strong consensus that Mojtaba Khamenei will remain the Supreme Leader of Iran through June 30, 2026, with the leading market outcome assigning only about a 5-7% chance of leadership change by that date. There is no significant credible reporting or external driver indicating an imminent removal or resignation before the deadline. Given the stability of the regime and the market odds, the probability of a leadership change by June 30 is low but not negligible.
Current prediction markets and analysis indicate a low probability of a leadership change for Mojtaba Khamenei by the end of June 2026. Market data from platforms like Polymarket and OddsShift consistently price the 'Yes' outcome at approximately 7%, reflecting a strong consensus that no such transition or removal is expected within this short timeframe.
The prediction markets on Polymarket and OddsShift provide a consensus probability of around 7% for a leadership change in Iran by June 30, 2026. This low probability is supported by the lack of significant recent political upheaval or credible reports indicating an imminent change in leadership.
Polymarket prices the 'Iran leadership change by June 30?' market (focused on Mojtaba Khamenei) at 7% YES, and Polyguana notes the lead outcome is No at 93%.
Based on current market odds (~15% on Polymarket) and the absence of any official Israeli announcement or credible reporting indicating a broad airspace closure, the probability is low. Recent regional tensions did not lead to a closure, and daily life has normalized. With only a few days left, the chance of a major, Israel-initiated closure is estimated at 12%.
Recent reports indicate that despite regional missile activity linked to Iran, daily life and commercial activities in Israel, including aviation, have largely resumed without any official announcement of a broad airspace closure. Market odds have sharply decreased for a major Israeli airspace shutdown by June 15, reflecting the absence of government signals for such a closure and the differentiation of risk between Iran and Israel. Given these factors, a major closure appears unlikely but not impossible due to ongoing regional tensions.
Current reporting indicates that daily life in Israel has largely resumed following recent regional tensions, and there have been no official announcements or credible signals from Israeli aviation authorities suggesting a broad, nationwide closure of civilian airspace. Given that the deadline is only a few days away and market sentiment has shifted toward a 'No' resolution, the likelihood of such a major, government-initiated shutdown occurring in this short timeframe is low.
Recent reports indicate that daily life in Israel has resumed after missile threats, with no official announcement of a broad airspace closure. The Polymarket contract odds have fallen sharply, reflecting this normalization. Additionally, there are no indications from Israeli aviation authorities or credible sources suggesting an imminent major closure.
The probability of Israel initiating a major closure of its airspace by June 15 is low, as recent reports indicate that daily life and commercial activity in Israel, including in Tel Aviv, have largely resumed despite regional tensions [apnews.com](https://apnews.com). There has been no official announcement from Israeli aviation authorities signaling a broad closure, which is required for a 'Yes' resolution. Market odds on Polymarket have also declined sharply, reflecting reduced trader expectations for such an event [polymarket.com](https://polymarket.com). Additionally, traders are differentiating between Iranian and Israeli airspace risks, with higher concern for Iran but not Israel [global-political-spotlight.com](https://www.global-political-spotlight.com).
Polymarket odds are 19%, and there's no official closure notice with daily life resuming after recent sirens.
Mean of 6/6 valid model forecasts.
The geopolitical relationship between Israel and Iran is characterized by deep-seated ideological hostility, proxy conflicts, and a lack of diplomatic recognition. Given the current state of regional tensions and the absence of any formal diplomatic channels or ongoing peace negotiations, the likelihood of a permanent, formal peace treaty being signed by June 30, 2026, is extremely low. Market sentiment on platforms like [polymarket.com](https://polymarket.com/event/israel-x-iran-permanent-peace-deal-by) reflects this, with the probability of such an event consistently near zero.
The current market odds on Polymarket suggest a 3% chance of a permanent peace deal between Israel and Iran by June 30, 2026. Given the historical context of tensions and the lack of recent diplomatic breakthroughs, this estimate seems reasonable. The key factors include the ongoing hostilities, the complexity of the geopolitical landscape, and the absence of significant recent negotiations.
The Polymarket market shows a 'Yes' price of 3.1¢, indicating low market expectation. No clear definitive agreement or confirmation has been reported as of now.
Current market data and trading volumes indicate a very low probability (around 1-3%) that the Strait of Hormuz traffic will return to a 7-day moving average of 60 or more transit calls by June 15, 2026. Given ongoing geopolitical tensions and disruptions in the region, a rapid return to normal traffic levels is unlikely within this timeframe. The strict criteria of the IMF Portwatch data and the low market confidence further support this low probability estimate.
Current market sentiment and available data indicate that shipping traffic in the Strait of Hormuz remains significantly below the threshold required for a 'Yes' resolution. Given the persistent geopolitical tensions and the current trend in IMF Portwatch data, it is highly unlikely that the 7-day moving average of transit calls will reach 60 by the June 15, 2026 deadline.
The current market odds on Polymarket indicate a 3.4% chance of the event resolving to 'Yes', which suggests a very low probability. The key factor is the historical and current data on transit calls in the Strait of Hormuz, which has not shown a 7-day moving average of 60 or above recently. The resolution depends entirely on the IMF Portwatch data, and the threshold is quite high, making it unlikely to be met by June 15, 2026.
The probability is based on the current trading odds on Polymarket, which reflect collective market expectations. Multiple sources report the 'Yes' probability at 3.4%, derived from the market price. This low probability suggests that traders expect continued disruptions or insufficient data to reach a 7-day moving average of 60 or more transit calls by June 15, 2026. The resolution depends strictly on IMF Portwatch publishing the required data, which may be affected by reporting delays or actual traffic levels.
Based on current market odds and the criteria of a 7-day moving average of transit calls ≥60 from IMF Portwatch, the likelihood of meeting the threshold by June 15 is very low.
timeout after 30000ms
The Strait of Hormuz is a critical maritime chokepoint, and traffic levels have historically fluctuated due to geopolitical tensions and regional conflicts. Given the current absence of major disruptions reported and the market data indicating a roughly 60% chance of traffic returning to normal by the end of June 2026, it is reasonable to assign a moderate probability that the 7-day moving average of transit calls will reach or exceed 60. The key factors include the strategic importance of the strait, current stability trends, and the market's aggregated data reflecting trader sentiment and available information.
The current market sentiment and available data suggest a low probability of reaching the required 7-day moving average of 60 transit calls by June 30, 2026. Given the ongoing geopolitical tensions in the region, which have historically suppressed shipping volumes, a significant recovery to the specified threshold within the remaining timeframe is unlikely without a major de-escalation.
The current market odds on Polymarket suggest a 60% probability of the Strait of Hormuz traffic returning to normal by the end of June 2026. This is based on the 7-day moving average of transit calls reaching or exceeding 60 as reported by IMF Portwatch. The market's resolution criteria and the historical data trends from IMF Portwatch are key factors in this estimation.
Current market pricing and analysis suggest low confidence in traffic normalizing by June 30, 2026. The 7-day moving average threshold of 60 transit calls has not yet been met, and geopolitical tensions, including fraying ceasefire efforts and stalled Iran talks, continue to pose risks to shipping [clearmarket.fyi](https://clearmarket.fyi/events/strait-of-hormuz-traffic-returns-to-normal-by-end-of-june/). The significant gap between June and December contract prices indicates growing uncertainty about near-term normalization.
Current market data from Polymarket and ClearMarket indicates a low probability, with factors like the 7-day moving average requirement and time frame to June 30, 2026.
Mean of 5/6 valid model forecasts.
The US has launched two consecutive nights of strikes on Iran (June 10-11) and officials like Hegseth and Trump have used aggressive rhetoric, but the administration has explicitly avoided declaring the April 8 ceasefire over, instead framing strikes as leverage for a deal. The market requires a clear, official statement that no ceasefire is in effect, not just actions or threats. Given the short remaining window (until June 12 end) and the administration's apparent strategy of maintaining the ceasefire's legal status while escalating militarily, a formal announcement is plausible but not highly likely. Base rates for such explicit declarations in similar coercive bargaining situations are low.
Despite ongoing US strikes on Iran and escalating tensions, the Trump administration has not officially announced the end of the ceasefire. Statements emphasize using military strikes as leverage to negotiate a deal rather than declaring the ceasefire over. However, the intensity of strikes and Trump's strong rhetoric increase the likelihood of an official announcement ending the ceasefire by June 12.
While the U.S. is currently conducting military strikes against Iran, the administration has explicitly stated that it does not consider the April 8 ceasefire to be over, framing the strikes as leverage to force a better deal. Given that the deadline is June 12, there is a relatively short window for an official declaration that the ceasefire is formally terminated, and the current strategy appears to be using military pressure to maintain the negotiation process rather than abandoning the agreement entirely.
The current situation indicates heightened tensions and military strikes, but no official announcement of a ceasefire ending. Trump and Hegseth have emphasized negotiations and leverage through strikes, not a formal declaration of ceasefire termination. The base rate for such announcements is low, and the current rhetoric does not suggest an imminent official statement.
Recent U.S. military strikes on Iran, described as 'self-defense' and leverage in negotiations, have occurred under President Trump's administration, as reported by [timesofisrael.com](https://www.timesofisrael.com/us-launches-strikes-for-second-straight-night-in-bid-to-force-iran-to-agree-on-deal/) and [aljazeera.com](https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/6/10/us-defence-secretary-hegseth-pledges-strikes-on-key-facilities-in-iran). However, officials including Defense Secretary Hegseth have explicitly stated that the U.S. does not intend to restart full-scale conflict and is not declaring the April 8 ceasefire over. Instead, the administration appears to be using military pressure to advance negotiations without formally ending the ceasefire. Trump and his administration have not made any public statement indicating that the ceasefire is no longer in effect, which is required for a 'Yes' resolution. Given the current strategy of leveraging force while maintaining the ceasefire framework, the probability of an official announcement ending the ceasefire by June 12 is low but not negligible, especially if negotiations collapse abruptly.
Recent US strikes and Trump/Hegseth's rhetoric suggest potential for an official ceasefire announcement, but uncertainty remains.
Mean of 6/6 valid model forecasts.
The deadline is June 15, 2026, only 4 days away from the current date (June 11, 2026). Multiple prediction markets place the probability of a permanent peace deal at around 1-5%, and no credible reporting indicates an imminent breakthrough. The temporary ceasefire from April 7, 2026 is explicitly excluded from counting. Given the extremely short remaining timeline, the high bar for a 'permanent' deal, and no signs of a formal agreement, the chance of a Yes resolution is very low.
Given the current geopolitical tensions and the lack of any signed memorandum of understanding (MOU) or definitive peace agreement as of early June 2026, the probability of a permanent peace deal being reached by June 15, 2026, remains low. Historical difficulties in US-Iran relations, combined with the absence of clear public confirmation from both governments, suggest a low likelihood of a lasting peace deal within the short timeframe.
Given the current date of June 11, 2026, and the deadline of June 15, 2026, there is very little time remaining for the complex diplomatic negotiations required for a permanent peace treaty. Current market sentiment and reporting indicate that a memorandum of understanding remains unsigned, and the high threshold for a 'permanent' cessation of hostilities makes a breakthrough in the next four days highly unlikely.
The likelihood of a permanent peace deal between the US and Iran by June 15, 2026, is low due to the complex geopolitical dynamics and historical context of the relationship. While there have been recent ceasefire agreements, these are temporary and do not indicate a lasting resolution. The requirement for a formal, signed agreement or clear public confirmation from both governments adds another layer of uncertainty.
timeout after 30000ms
No strong current evidence of a definitive permanent peace deal being reached by the deadline; past temporary ceasefires are a factor.
Mean of 5/6 valid model forecasts.
Current prediction markets price this at about 20%. Talks are scheduled (e.g., Witkoff–Araghchi meeting in Istanbul), but the bar is a publicly announced mutual agreement, not just negotiations. Geopolitical tensions (Houthi strikes, U.S. military buildup) and the short timeline make a formal deal unlikely, consistent with the 20% market estimate.
Current prediction markets and expert assessments place the probability of a US-Iran nuclear deal by June 30, 2026, at around 20%. The geopolitical situation remains tense with ongoing regional conflicts and significant gaps between the parties on key nuclear issues. While diplomatic efforts continue, the high bar for a formal, binding agreement within the limited timeframe makes a deal unlikely but not impossible.
The geopolitical climate between the United States and Iran is currently characterized by significant escalation and regional conflict, which makes the negotiation of a formal, binding nuclear agreement highly improbable within the short timeframe remaining before June 30, 2026. While some diplomatic channels may exist, the requirement for a publicly announced, mutual agreement on sensitive nuclear research and weapon development is an extremely high bar that necessitates a level of trust and de-escalation that is currently absent. Market sentiment and expert analysis [polymarket.com](https://polymarket.com/event/us-iran-nuclear-deal-by-june-30), [manifold.markets](https://manifold.markets/bens/us-iran-nuclear-deal-by-end-of-june) consistently reflect the difficulty of achieving such a breakthrough under current conditions.
Prediction markets currently imply a live probability of approximately 32.0% for a US-Iran nuclear deal by June 30, 2026. This reflects the consensus of traders who are continuously updating their estimates based on new developments and information. The key factors include the current state of negotiations, historical context of US-Iran relations, and the political climate in both countries.
While diplomatic channels remain open through intermediaries, the lack of direct talks, ongoing nuclear advancements by Iran, and deep structural disagreements make a formal agreement unlikely. Recent market movement suggests brief optimism, but base rates and political constraints favor continued stalemate. A 25% probability accounts for low but non-negligible potential for breakthrough under high-pressure scenarios.
Current prediction market data from Polymarket and PredictionNinja indicates a 20% probability, considering the need for an official public agreement by the deadline.
Mean of 6/6 valid model forecasts.
The Polymarket for the June 30 deadline is trading at 86% Yes, reflecting strong market confidence. Although a May 31 deadline passed without a restart, recent credible reports (WSJ) indicate the US Navy has resumed escort activities, and the US military denial may not preclude a formal announcement before June 30. Given the market signal and the ongoing operations, a definitive announcement by the deadline is more likely than not, but the denial and past miss warrant a slightly lower probability than the market.
Recent reports indicate that the US military denies having officially restarted Project Freedom, and the US government has shifted to a quieter, less public approach to protecting vessels in the Strait of Hormuz without explicitly reviving Project Freedom. While some coordination with commercial ships is ongoing, no definitive announcement has been made by Trump, the US government, or military about restarting Project Freedom by June 30, 2026. Given the lack of official confirmation and the US's preference for a low-profile approach, the probability of an explicit restart announcement is low but not zero.
While the administration is engaging in 'quiet' coordination with commercial shippers to facilitate transit through the Strait of Hormuz, they have explicitly denied restarting 'Project Freedom' or formal escort programs [straitstimes.com]. Given that the administration previously abandoned the initiative due to regional tensions and has since adopted a strategy of non-public, informal assistance, a formal, definitive announcement to restart the program by June 30 is unlikely [iranintl.com].
While there is evidence of U.S. military involvement in facilitating ship transits through the Strait of Hormuz, there has been no definitive announcement of restarting Project Freedom. The administration has been cautious and has not publicly committed to a formal restart of the project, opting for a more covert approach.
timeout after 30000ms
While there was a denial of a restart, there remains a possibility of a definitive announcement. The Polymarket market already has a high probability, and the existence of a quiet version of the initiative adds to the potential for a 'Yes' resolution.
Mean of 5/6 valid model forecasts.